ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial intelligence-enhanced wearable technology enables ventricular arrhythmia prediction.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Phenotyping, Mechanism Discovery, and Clinical Applications.Cardiology in review · 2026Article
- Digital health solutions for chronic disease physical activity management: wearable devices, artificial intelligence, and public health implementation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Hearts, Data, and Artificial Intelligence Wizardry: From Imitation to Innovation in Cardiovascular Care.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death: A guide for clinicians.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Patterns in physical behaviour may be associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. We examined associations between temporal dynamics in physical behaviour measured through wearable technology and the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Methods and results: The multicentre, prospective SAFEHEART study recruited 303 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) from May 2021 to September 2022. Continuous physical behaviour data were collected over 365 consecutive days and nights using wearable accelerometers. We characterized each 28-day behavioural time series using statistical summary indices and deep representations learned by neural networks. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the associations between physical behaviour and the subsequent risk of ventricular arrhythmia as detected by ICD and treated appropriately. Predictive performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation and quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From the SAFEHEART cohort, 277 patients and 56 ventricular arrhythmia were analysed, contributing to a total of 64 995 days of behavioural data. Reduced numbers of daily physical activity bouts and low day-to-day variation in sleep characteristics were associated with an increased risk of an arrhythmic event. Deep representations improved the predictive performance, with an AUROC of 0.74 ± 0.05, compared with statistical summary indices with an AUROC 0.67 ± 0.14 ( Conclusion: Our findings suggest that behavioural patterns captured through wearable technology are independently associated with ventricular arrhythmia, particularly when these are characterised by deep representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.