ArticleMalariaWorld journal2026
Analysis of clinical malaria hotspots according to transmission levels in two health areas of the Kolondieba health district, Mali.
Article in MalariaWorld journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite significant progress, malaria remains a major challenge in Mali, due to heterogeneous transmission. The WHO 'High Burden to High Impact' strategy advocates targeting of high-transmission areas. This study aimed to identify clinical malaria hotspots in two health areas within the Kolondieba district with differing transmission levels. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study analysed 35,934 confirmed malaria cases extracted from consultation registers between 2019 and 2021 in the health areas of Kadiana (high risk) and Kolondieba Central (moderate risk). Transmission periods were determined in each zone by analysing variations in mean incidence trends, and high-risk clusters (hotspots) were identified using Kulldorff's method according to these periods. Results: Transmission periods and hotspot identification (2019-2021) revealed distinct dynamics between the two health areas. In Kadiana, the majority of clusters remained stable, with persistent hotspots across all eight periods (Kadiana and Tienkourani; RR: 1.8-6.3). In Kolondieba Central, hotspot dynamics evolved from a localised configuration (1 to 2 villages) towards spatial expansion, with more extensive clusters appearing during the final periods (RR: 1.7-2.2). Kolondieba town remained a persistent hotspot. Conclusions: This study confirms the heterogeneity of transmission at a fine scale, with stable hotspots even in both moderate and high-risk areas. It is essential to focus on human mobility to guide malaria control interventions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.