Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078232›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Fracture Healing and Commonly Co-Prescribed Medications: Orthopedic Implications in Multimorbid Patients: A Narrative Review.

Yash Sharma, Babajide Obidigbo, Ikedichim Nwankwo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yash SharmaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Belfast, GBR.
Babajide ObidigboOrthopaedics and Trauma, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Ikedichim NwankwoEmergency, University of Port Harcourt, Port-Harcourt, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture healing is a biologically complex process influenced not only by mechanical stability and patient-related factors but also by systemic medications commonly prescribed in orthopedic populations. In contemporary practice, many adults sustaining fractures are treated within a broader context of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, raising clinical questions about how commonly co-prescribed drug classes may intersect with biological pathways relevant to bone repair and recovery. However, evidence addressing these relationships remains dispersed across disciplines and is characterized by heterogeneity in study design, exposure definitions, and outcome measures. To contextualize current evidence, we conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature identified primarily through PubMed/MEDLINE, supplemented by manual screening of reference lists from key articles and reviews. The review focused on adult fracture populations and perioperative orthopedic settings and synthesized findings from observational studies, randomized trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses examining associations between fracture-related outcomes and medication classes frequently encountered in routine practice. These medication classes were evaluated individually rather than as interacting polypharmacy regimens, while remaining situated within the broader clinical context of multimorbidity and cumulative medication burden. These included analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, anticoagulants, psychotropic medications, proton pump inhibitors, antidiabetic therapies, and other bone-active agents. Across the literature, several medication classes have been associated with altered fracture-related or skeletal outcomes relevant to orthopedic recovery in specific clinical contexts, although findings were inconsistent and often highly context-dependent. Evidence linking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, and anticoagulant therapies to fracture healing outcomes varied according to drug class, timing and duration of exposure, comorbidity burden, and fracture characteristics. For other commonly prescribed agents, including psychotropic medications, acid-suppressive therapies, and certain antidiabetic drugs, available data largely address fracture risk or bone health rather than fracture union or time to healing, limiting direct inference regarding repair processes. While some mechanisms underlying fracture risk, such as altered bone turnover or impaired bone quality, may overlap with pathways involved in repair, these processes are not biologically equivalent to the coordinated inflammatory, reparative, and remodeling phases of fracture healing and, therefore, require cautious interpretation. Overall, current evidence suggests that fracture healing in adult orthopedic patients frequently occurs within a complex therapeutic landscape shaped by cumulative medication exposure and underlying metabolic and clinical factors. Rather than implicating polypharmacy as a single causal determinant of impaired union, these findings highlight the importance of individualized medication review and interdisciplinary care when managing fractures in patients with multimorbidity. Future research should prioritize prospective designs with standardized, fracture-healing-specific outcomes to better clarify medication-related risks and inform evidence-based orthopedic practice.

Indexed as

fracture healingmedication effectsorthopedic outcomespolypharmacyunion outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42078232
PMCPMC13135219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.