ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
A novel Artificial Intelligence-assisted white light endoscopic model in the diagnosis of cardia atrophy: a multicenter study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Atrophy extends beyond the cardia is open atrophy and closely related to gastric cancer. However, there is difficulty in determining cardia atrophy under endoscopy. Methods: This is multicenter prospective study, a total of 895 patients were assigned to the training and validation sets to establish a cardia atrophy diagnostic model. A total of 220 patients were included in the internal test set. Additionally, a total of 354 patients were included in the external test set. In the internal and external test sets, three senior and three junior endoscopists made online diagnoses, comparing the performance differences to the artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system. Results: In the internal test dataset, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI-assisted cardia atrophy diagnostic system were 0.927, 0.941, and 0.919, respectively, with a positivev predictive value (PPV) of 0.878, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.962, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.967. In the external test dataset, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.918, 0.894, and 0.931 respectively, with a PPV of 0.874, NPV of 0.943, and AUC of 0.953. Furthermore, it was found that the diagnosis accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the AI-assisted system were all higher than those of senior endoscopists. The receiver operating characteristic curve area (AUC) of AI-assisted system was 0.967 and 0.953 in the internal and external test sets, respectively. Heat map showed a high consistency between the AI-system and endoscopists. Conclusion: Our newly developed AI-assisted system shows superior performance in identifying cardia atrophy compared to senior endoscopists, and can be used to guide endoscopic judgment and targeted biopsies for cardia atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.