ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Bidirectional coupling among EMT, AXL-RB1 signaling and lineage switch drives resistance to osimertinib and worse clinical outcomes in NSCLC.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acquired resistance to osimertinib remains a major barrier in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and in many patients cannot be explained by secondary targetable mutations. This pattern highlights a central role for non-genetic plasticity programs, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), drug tolerance, immune evasion, and lineage switch. Here, we used a systems-level framework to define how these processes are coordinated. We constructed a minimal gene regulatory network integrating core EMT regulators with AXL, RB1, PD-L1, and NF-κB, and analysed its emergent behaviour using dynamical simulations. The network resolved into two mutually inhibitory, self-reinforcing "teams": an epithelial/sensitive team centred on RB1, miR-200, miR-34, p53, and E-cadherin, and a mesenchymal/resistant team centred on ZEB1, SNAIL, AXL, PD-L1, and NF-κB. Simulations predicted a strong coupling between EMT and osimertinib resistance, which was validated across bulk transcriptomic datasets from NSCLC cell lines, EGFR-mutant patient cohorts, and perturbation experiments. Inducing EMT increased RB1-loss programs, whereas osimertinib exposure induced AXL and EMT programs, supporting bidirectional regulation and reinforcement. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses further showed that EMT, AXL, PD-L1 activity, and reduced RB1 signaling co-occur within tumors. Clinically, activation of individual axes such as EMT, RB1 loss, or PD-L1 upregulation was associated with worse outcomes, while combined activation produced markedly poorer survival than any single axis alone. Extending the network to incorporate lineage regulators further linked a partial LUAD-to-LUSC shift with EMT, RB1 loss, and resistance. Together, these findings identify a network topology that coordinates multiple plasticity programs driving osimertinib resistance and suggest that disrupting this cooperative architecture may offer a therapeutic strategy in EGFR-mutant LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.