ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Contamination of Engram Coactivity Networks During Forgetting.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forgetting is a fundamental component of adaptive memory and essential for cognitive flexibility, yet its cellular basis remains unclear. Here we establish a mouse model of retroactive interference (RI) and show that post-learning novelty exploration induces active forgetting of hippocampus-dependent object location memory only within a discrete consolidation window defined by protein synthesis sensitivity. RI imposed within this window reduces engram reactivation and destabilizes a structured coactivity network formed during learning. Mice that forget retrieve reorganized engram with increased edge turnover and reduced training edge survival during recall. During this vulnerable period, RI infiltrates the engram core, whereas after consolidation it remains confined to the network periphery. Over the consolidation window, the engram network progressively matures, acquiring greater density, similarity, and k-core robustness, features that confer resistance to interference. Importantly, blocking RI infiltration rescues memory formation. Together, these findings show that forgetting arises from reorganization of engram topology during consolidation and identify engram core contamination as a network-level substrate for forgetting.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.