ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026
Beyond QTL and GWAS: how deep learning, graph models, and multi-omics are reshaping plant genomic prediction analysis.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Beyond static snapshots: predicting dynamic, explainable intermediate phenotypes for climate-resilient crop breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional genetic mapping has advanced plant trait studies but struggles to capture epistasis, pleiotropy, and genotype-environment (G × E) interactions in genomic prediction (GP). Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has provided innovative methods. Main body: This review outlines the transition from traditional frameworks to AI-enabled approaches for plant trait analysis. Specifically, major statistical and AI methods are summarized; current strategies for combining genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, phenotypic, and environmental data are described; and examinations are carried out over how graph-based and Transformer models represent regulatory networks and higher-order interactions. This paper further explores developments in multi-task learning, cross-population and cross-species transfer, and emerging foundation-style models. Key issues related to interpretability, reproducibility, data quality, and evaluation practices are considered in the context of practical deployment. Conclusion: AI-driven models are reshaping plant trait analysis by extending traditional association methods toward scalable, biologically informed prediction. Continued efforts in data standardization, transparent models, and validation across time and environments will determine the broader impact of these approaches in crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.