Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080094›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026

Beyond QTL and GWAS: how deep learning, graph models, and multi-omics are reshaping plant genomic prediction analysis.

Tong Wang, Ran Tong, Zheng Yuan, Yue Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tong Wang *Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Ran Tong *Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Zheng YuanInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yue LiPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional genetic mapping has advanced plant trait studies but struggles to capture epistasis, pleiotropy, and genotype-environment (G × E) interactions in genomic prediction (GP). Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has provided innovative methods. Main body: This review outlines the transition from traditional frameworks to AI-enabled approaches for plant trait analysis. Specifically, major statistical and AI methods are summarized; current strategies for combining genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, phenotypic, and environmental data are described; and examinations are carried out over how graph-based and Transformer models represent regulatory networks and higher-order interactions. This paper further explores developments in multi-task learning, cross-population and cross-species transfer, and emerging foundation-style models. Key issues related to interpretability, reproducibility, data quality, and evaluation practices are considered in the context of practical deployment. Conclusion: AI-driven models are reshaping plant trait analysis by extending traditional association methods toward scalable, biologically informed prediction. Continued efforts in data standardization, transparent models, and validation across time and environments will determine the broader impact of these approaches in crop improvement.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecrop improvementgenomic predictiongenotype-environment interactionmulti-omics integrationnonlinear modeling

Identifiers

PMID42080094
PMCPMC13132505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.