Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080711›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2026

Biological cleansing: Toward improving ocular surface surgical outcomes.

Rohit Shetty, Nimisha R Kumar, Pooja Khamar, Nithin Kiran, Vibha Singh, Shubham Pawar, Panah Shetty, S Gokul, Swaminathan Sethu, Arkasubhra Ghosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rohit ShettyDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nimisha R KumarGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Netralaya Foundation, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Pooja KhamarDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nithin KiranGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Netralaya Foundation, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vibha SinghDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shubham PawarGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Netralaya Foundation, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Panah ShettyDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
S GokulGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Netralaya Foundation, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Swaminathan SethuGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Netralaya Foundation, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Arkasubhra GhoshGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Netralaya Foundation, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative complications such as dry eye, ocular surface pain, and abnormal wound healing responses, including fibrosis or ectasia, remain a significant concern in corneal, refractive, and cataract surgeries as they occur even in those patients without the classical clinical risk factors. Persistent low-grade or subclinical ocular surface inflammation in these patients may have contributed to these suboptimal outcomes. Inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, TNFα, IFNγ, and/or MMP-9 are reported to be higher on the ocular surface of patients with either overt or subclinical inflammation. These inflammatory factors disrupt tissue homeostasis and wound healing response as they (i) sensitize nociceptive (pain) pathways, (ii) destabilize cell-cell adhesion, (iii) increase TGFβ-dependent or independent extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition leading to scarring, and/or (iv) cause ectasia by decreasing ECM deposition and natural collagen cross-linking. These effects of molecular risk factors can be mitigated by preoperative BIOLOGICAL CLEANSING strategies designed to reduce the load of these inflammatory factors on the ocular surface. Depending on the clinical presentation and inflammatory load status, biological cleansing using (i) lubricants; (ii) eyelid hygiene; (iii) ocular surface washes; (iv) topical or oral nutraceuticals; (v) nonpharmacological treatments, such as thermal pulsation therapy and intense light therapy; (vi) topical immunomodulators, such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, steroids, and Lifitegrast; and (vii) lifestyle modifications, such as diet and probiotics, can be followed. We and others have shown a reduction in these inflammatory factors on the ocular surface using one or more of these strategies. Incorporating biological cleansing protocols into presurgical preparation is a vital step toward modulating ocular surface biology to improve postoperative outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesDry Eye SyndromesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsWound HealingHumansBiological cleansingcytokineslid wipesocular surfacesubclinical inflammationsurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID42080711
PMCPMC13235790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.