Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080832›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Pain Retrained: Outcomes Analysis of an Online, Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Education Programme.

Maura McCarron, Francis Agnew, Claire Briggs, Jason Brooks, Martin Dempster, Danielle Rainey, Kevin E Vowles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maura McCarronSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0640-569X
Francis AgnewBelfast Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Claire BriggsBelfast Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Jason BrooksBelfast Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Martin DempsterSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Danielle RaineyBelfast Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Kevin E VowlesSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideoconferencing to deliver chronic pain education offers improved accessibility and scalability. However, evidence regarding such interventions is largely absent, thus it is necessary to assess their clinical value. This study evaluated the impact of a group-based interdisciplinary chronic pain education programme, Pain Retrained, delivered via videoconferencing.

methodsThis study employed a single-arm longitudinal design with measures collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Six weekly online sessions of two hours each were delivered to groups as the first point of contact with a secondary care pain service. Changes were evaluated via multilevel Structural Equation Modelling. Indices of acceptability were assessed post-intervention.

resultsIn total, 261 participants (62.1% female) completed Pain Retrained. There was sustained change through follow-up for pain self-efficacy and social functioning and post-intervention only change for depression and pain-anxiety. Change was non-significant for pain intensity and pain interference. Effect sizes ranged from negligible to medium (range Cohen's d = 0.03-0.74). The majority of participants, 85.4% reported improved understanding of pain.

conclusionThere has been growing interest in advancing pain education through online modalities. This study shows that live, clinician-led online pain education is feasible and acceptable for people with chronic pain, with high satisfaction and perceived utility. These data are among the first to examine the effectiveness of this approach in relation to clinical outcomes. While outcomes were mixed, reflecting the complexity of chronic pain and limits of education alone, these findings extend existing knowledge by demonstrating this approach offers an accessible and scalable adjunct to care. SIGNIFICANCE: The expansion of digital health interventions has outpaced evidence supporting their use in chronic pain care. By providing longitudinal, practice-based evidence from a novel large-scale programme, this study provides timely evidence to guide integration of online education into care pathways. It informs service planning while identifying key targets for optimisation, including integration with behaviour change strategies. The work also establishes priorities for further research to test efficacy and mechanisms of action in digitally delivered pain care.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacyVideoconferencingchronic paininterdisciplinaryonline educationtelehealthvideoconference

Identifiers

PMID42080832
PMCPMC13138362

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.