Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080928›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2026

Phytogenic and natural immunostimulants in the prevention of Lactococcus garvieae infection: an eco-friendly approach.

Ehsan Ahmadifar, Sevdan Yilmaz, Mohammed A E Naiel, Deepak Chandran, Morteza Yousefi, Najmeh Sheikhzadeh, Sureshkumar Rajalingam, Narges Dargahi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ehsan AhmadifarDepartment of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. Ehsan.Ahmadifar@uoz.ac.ir.
Sevdan YilmazDepartment of Aquaculture, Marine Science and Technology Faculty, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, 17100, Turkey.
Mohammed A E NaielDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. mohammednaiel.1984@gmail.com.
Deepak ChandranDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Government of Kerala, Nellaya, Kerala, 679335, India.
Morteza YousefiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, RUDN University, Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation.
Najmeh SheikhzadehDepartment of food Hygiene and Aquatic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Sureshkumar RajalingamDepartment of Agronomy, Amrita School of Agricultural Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 642109, India.
Narges DargahiInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaculture is developing in many countries to meet the rising protein demand associated with a rapidly growing human population. However, intensification of production brings with it challenges such as deteriorating water quality and increasing disease outbreaks. These conditions lead to an increased risk of infectious diseases and led to higher mortality rates, which causes economic losses. Lactococcosis, particularly that caused by the Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus garvieae, is one of the most common of these problems and can cause significant losses in various fish species. The intensive use of antibiotics for control purposes creates additional risks in terms of antimicrobial resistance, environmental pollution, and food safety. Therefore, natural feed additives have gained importance in recent years. Certain additives that support immune responses and increase disease resistance in fish have become prominent. Among these, phytobiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics are the most well-known and effective. Their widespread availability, lower cost, and environmental safety make these additives considered an alternative approach to aquaculture. Studies show that these additives strengthen both innate and adaptive immune responses, reduce infection severity, and reduce mortality associated with L. garvieae infections. However, there are still gaps in knowledge regarding how these substances regulate mechanisms such as the immune system, inflammatory processes, antioxidant defenses, and interactions with pathogens. This review aims to clarify these mechanisms by bringing together scientific data obtained in recent years. It also discusses how the information obtained can contribute to the development of safer feed additive strategies and the development of new vaccine approaches. This aims to support the establishment of a more sustainable production structure in the aquaculture sector.

Indexed as

AquacultureFish DiseasesGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsLactococcusPlant ExtractsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsFishesProbioticsAdjuvants, ImmunologicPlant ExtractsAntibiotic alternativesBacterial diseasesImmunostimulantsLactococcus garvieaePhytobiotics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.