ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
Phytogenic and natural immunostimulants in the prevention of Lactococcus garvieae infection: an eco-friendly approach.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology-Based Immunostimulants in Aquaculture: Mechanisms, Advances and Practical Applications.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquaculture is developing in many countries to meet the rising protein demand associated with a rapidly growing human population. However, intensification of production brings with it challenges such as deteriorating water quality and increasing disease outbreaks. These conditions lead to an increased risk of infectious diseases and led to higher mortality rates, which causes economic losses. Lactococcosis, particularly that caused by the Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus garvieae, is one of the most common of these problems and can cause significant losses in various fish species. The intensive use of antibiotics for control purposes creates additional risks in terms of antimicrobial resistance, environmental pollution, and food safety. Therefore, natural feed additives have gained importance in recent years. Certain additives that support immune responses and increase disease resistance in fish have become prominent. Among these, phytobiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics are the most well-known and effective. Their widespread availability, lower cost, and environmental safety make these additives considered an alternative approach to aquaculture. Studies show that these additives strengthen both innate and adaptive immune responses, reduce infection severity, and reduce mortality associated with L. garvieae infections. However, there are still gaps in knowledge regarding how these substances regulate mechanisms such as the immune system, inflammatory processes, antioxidant defenses, and interactions with pathogens. This review aims to clarify these mechanisms by bringing together scientific data obtained in recent years. It also discusses how the information obtained can contribute to the development of safer feed additive strategies and the development of new vaccine approaches. This aims to support the establishment of a more sustainable production structure in the aquaculture sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42080928What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.