ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2026
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Arabic version of the Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire among Omani patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Three Adherence Assessment Tools in Omani Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study of Agreement and Association with HbA1c.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate an Arabic version of the Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire (MAUQ-ar-OM) for Omani adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to assess its association with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). A cross-sectional psychometric validation was conducted at a tertiary-care hospital in Oman from October 2024 to January 2025, enrolling 300 participants. The MAUQ was translated and culturally adapted using forward-backward translation, expert panel review (n = 4), and cognitive interview testing and then administered by a trained clinical pharmacist using a standardized script. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) compared second order and bifactor models using CFI, TLI, RMSEA (90% CI) and SRMR. Convergent validity with HbA1c was assessed using Spearman's correlation (ρ). The bifactor model showed superior fit indices (CFI = 0.904; TLI = 0.868; RMSEA = 0.055; SRMR = 0.057) compared with the second-order model (CFI = 0.849; TLI=0.819). Cronbach's α coefficients for total scores, positive attitude towards healthcare and medication (PAM), lack of discipline, aversion towards medication and active coping with health problems subscales were 0.69, 0.71, 0.67, 0.59 and 0.42, respectively. The PAM subscale showed small inverse correlation with HbA1c (ρ = -0.157; 95% CI: - 0.269 to - 0.041; p < 0.01), whereas other subscales and the total score showed no significant correlation. The MAUQ-ar-OM demonstrates construct validity for assessing medication adherence beliefs and behaviors among Arabic-speaking Omani adults with T2DM, with the bifactor structure supporting domain-level interpretation and the total score used descriptively. Further research is warranted to confirm reliability and generalizability across other Arabic-speaking populations, conditions and administration modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.