ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Psychosis Across the U.S.: State-Level Administrator and Provider Perspectives.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs for psychosis have proliferated across communities throughout the U.S. Although considered the gold standard of care for early psychosis, several states do not have CSC, and among states that do, there is limited availability in underserved communities, and implementation often varies based on geographical locations. We aimed to explore the views of state-level administrators and CSC providers regarding factors that inform the implementation and sustainability of CSC programs in community settings. Between June 2023 and January 2024, 10 state-level administrators/policy makers and 25 mental health providers from early intervention programs for first episode psychosis were purposively recruited across the United States to participate in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and deductive approaches which classified themes into program planning during pre-implementation and sustaining CSC after the implementation. Qualitative findings revealed four themes: (1) service demand; (2) organizational infrastructure; (3) community partnerships and outreach; and (4) model and service components. Service demand and organization infrastructure primarily influenced state-level decision making as to where CSC programs would be implemented. Community partnerships and outreach and model and service components’ themes highlight cultural and community-level considerations after CSC programs were implemented. The perspectives and experiences revealed from this study may guide the types of organizational, geographical, and cultural considerations necessary to address in future CSC implementation and sustainability efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42081007What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.