Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081519›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

Improving AlphaFold2 Performance in Virtual Screens Targeting GPCRs by Enhancing Binding-Site Conformational Sampling.

Núria Mitjavila-Domènech, Alejandro Díaz-Holguín, Huabin Hu, Nour Aldin Kahlous, Israel Cabeza de Vaca, Björn Wallner, Jens Carlsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Núria Mitjavila-DomènechScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC Box 596., SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0004-5595-0916
Alejandro Díaz-HolguínScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC Box 596., SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3449-5086
Huabin HuScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC Box 596., SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0001-6851-6340
Nour Aldin KahlousScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC Box 596., SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7744-1491
Israel Cabeza de VacaScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC Box 596., SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.
Björn WallnerDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Jens CarlssonScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC Box 596., SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4623-2977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has transformed protein structure prediction, with AlphaFold2 (AF2) generating models with near-experimental accuracy. However, as AF2 was trained to generate a single structural model, this method does not capture the conformational flexibility of proteins, limiting its utility for structure-based drug design. Here, we explore strategies to generate diverse ensembles of binding-site models suitable for structure-based virtual screening against G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a major class of drug targets. Our AFsample2T approach uses multiple sequence alignment column masking in the receptor binding site to reduce coevolutionary signals, leading to greater structural heterogeneity in the generated models. We demonstrate that ensembles of AFsample2T models capture multiple relevant binding-site conformations and reproduce experimentally observed conformational variability. Evaluation of AF2-based models in structure-based virtual screening using docking of actives and decoys shows that considering ensembles of diverse binding-site models substantially improves ligand enrichment. Our results provide guidelines for using AF2-based models in structure-based ligand discovery for GPCRs, and the AFsample2T approach can readily be applied to other protein classes.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledBinding SitesDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationProtein ConformationLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID42081519
PMCPMC13213828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.