ArticleScientific data2026
A large-scale 12-lead electrocardiogram dataset for acute coronary syndrome prediction containing 19,955 ECGs.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A large-scale 12-lead electrocardiogram dataset for acute coronary syndrome prediction containing 19,955 ECGs.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome(ACS) is a common cardiovascular disease and a severe type of coronary heart disease. Electrocardiograms(ECGs) are the initial and indispensable examination for patients suspected of ACS in emergency treatment. Particularly in patients with occlusion myocardial infarction(OMI), prompt medical intervention is imperative. Although ECG-based artificial intelligence(AI) models have achieved high diagnostic accuracy in conditions such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure, their application to ACS prediction has been limited by the scarcity of large, openly available ECG datasets. In this study, we present a comprehensive 12-lead ECG dataset for ACS prediction, comprising 19,955 ten-second recordings sampled at 500 Hz from 18,909 patients-all of whom underwent digital subtraction angiography. The dataset includes labels for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina, OMI, and infarction locations. Two physicians also assessed ACS and OMI identification, providing clinical diagnostic benchmarks. Furthermore, we developed and open-sourced a baseline deep learning model for OMI detection. This database and baseline model offer valuable resources for advancing AI research in ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.