ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2026
A qualitative study exploring and understanding the experiences and unmet needs of adults with type 2 diabetes and diabetes-related foot ulcers.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDiabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with depression, impaired health-related quality of life, an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and early mortality. To inform holistic care pathways, this qualitative study explored the experiences and unmet needs of adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and DFUs.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 adults with T2DM and current or previous DFUs, and 20 healthcare professionals with experience treating DFUs. Topic guides were underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsFour themes and three sub-themes were created relating to the impact of DFUs. DFUs were perceived as a 'wake-up call'; the experience often came as a shock, prompting individuals to consider what was responsible for their development. DFUs impacted individuals' behaviours in multiple ways: for some, they were a catalyst for positive change; for others, they fostered behaviours that were unhealthful and/or discordant with professionals' advice. DFUs negatively affected the physical and psychosocial well-being of individuals with DFU; sedentary behaviours instigated by DFUs led to changes in mood and mental health, in addition to increased weight, mobility problems and an amplified risk of health complications. Regarding the unmet needs of people with T2DM and DFUs, three themes were developed, capturing the need for treatment plans created through shared decision making and improving access to physical well-being and psychological support.
conclusionsThese findings identify several important areas of unmet need regarding care for adults with T2DM and DFUs, which can help inform improved support for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.