ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Plasticity in parental care: Interspecific competitor cues shape biparental cooperation in a burying beetle.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of social behaviour in providing resilience to environmental change.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Plasticity in parental care: Interspecific competitor cues shape biparental cooperation in a burying beetle.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interspecific competition is an important evolutionary driver of many species' life histories and behaviours, arising wherever species come into conflict over limited resources. However, how such competition shapes the plasticity of social behaviours within a species, such as biparental care, remains less clear. The burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides is an insect that exhibits biparental care, relying on small vertebrate carcasses to breed on. Such carcasses are highly valuable but relatively rare in nature, and so are competitively sought out by many other species, including the bluebottle fly, Calliphora vomitoria. Despite the close association and frequent rivalry between the two species, how their interactions shape biparental care decisions in these beetles has received little attention. We investigated how perceived risk of interspecific competition affected breeding success and duration of male and female care by staging encounters between breeding pairs of beetles and fly intruders. We presented breeding pairs with dead flies, at varying times and densities, to assess changes in duration of care and fitness outcomes. We used dead flies to ensure the beetles' response was driven solely by cues associated with flies, rather than direct interaction or resource depletion. We found that the duration of both male and female care was plastic in response to the presence of competitors, as both increased their duration of care. However, these encounters also increased breeding failures, with the strongest effects occurring when encounters took place early in the breeding attempt. Our results demonstrate plasticity in parents' behaviour in response to a perceived competitive threat, but this plastic response was associated with increased breeding failures, suggesting a trade-off between dealing with competitors and completing other parental tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.