ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Clinical Outcomes of Fetal Ventriculomegaly: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Referral Center.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate perinatal outcomes in fetal ventriculomegaly (VM). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 720 pregnancies diagnosed with fetal ventriculomegaly (VM) between 2014 and 2018. Cases were classified as isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM, n = 451) or non-isolated ventriculomegaly (NIVM, n = 269) based on the presence of additional prenatal imaging abnormalities. According to the width of the lateral ventricles, VM was further categorized as mild (10-11.9 mm, n = 555), moderate (12-14.9 mm, n = 88), or severe (≥15 mm, n = 77). Serial prenatal ultrasound measurements were used to evaluate intrauterine progression, which was defined as regressive (≥2 mm decrease), stable (<2 mm change), or progressive (≥2 mm increase) ventricular width. Periodic antenatal and postnatal imaging data were collected, and pregnancy outcomes were obtained through medical records and telephone follow-up. Results: Overall, favorable outcomes were observed in 93.75% of IVM cases, with rates of 95.31% in mild, 89.2% in moderate, and 25.0% in severe VM. In IVM cases, severe VM (OR = 60.214), intrauterine stability (OR = 5.687), and progression (OR = 34.88), were significantly associated with adverse outcomes. The NIVM group showed a significantly higher rate of pregnancy termination compared with the IVM group (39.5% vs 8.9%, p < 0.05). Among ongoing pregnancies, adverse outcomes were also more frequent in the NIVM group than in the IVM group (15.6% vs 6.25%, p < 0.05). Among cases with adverse outcomes, persistent intracranial imaging abnormalities were identified in 66.7% of NIVM cases and 57.1% of IVM cases. Conclusion: NIVM correlates with high termination/adverse outcome rates. VM severity intrauterine stability and progression are key risk factors, necessitating continuous imaging surveillance for optimal management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.