ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
AI in biocuration: challenges, opportunities, and a roadmap for sustainable integration.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Biocuration is the integration of biological information databases for the enhancement of research. Curation of these databases is challenged by the exponential growth of scientific data and literature. Integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence methods into biocuration workflows may help address this challenge. We report on the discussions, ideas, and recommendations gathered from a workshop "AI and biodata resources: implications for sustainability and best practices in biocuration" at the 18th Annual International Biocuration Conference 2025. Results: Participants agreed that while AI offers transformative potential for efficiency and expanded curatorial capacity, its integration faces substantial hurdles. Key challenges revolve around data and model quality. Reproducibility issues and a lack of open, domain-specific training datasets further compound these problems. Broader concerns include inconsistent data standards, underdeveloped ontologies, unstructured data, legacy systems, and underfunded teams.Despite these issues, several successful AI applications were identified, including tools for literature summarization and workflow assistance. Participants emphasized the need for a refined model of human-AI collaboration requiring clear data provenance and transparency, new skills, and avoiding over-reliance on AI-generated data. The workshop ultimately recommended concerted efforts in infrastructure development, standardization, training, and quality assurance to guide the community toward effective human-AI collaboration that maintains scientific rigor.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.