Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083647›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

AI in biocuration: challenges, opportunities, and a roadmap for sustainable integration.

Valerio Arnaboldi, Lynn M Schriml, Matt Jeffryes, Pengyuan Li, Susan Bello, Paul Sternberg, Carol Bult, Charles E Cook

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valerio ArnaboldiCaltech, Biology and Bioengineering, Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2563-5374
Lynn M SchrimlUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health, Baltimore, MD United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8910-9851
Matt JeffryesEMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-6271
Pengyuan LiIBM Almaden Research Center, Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-7611
Susan BelloJackson Laboratory, Mouse Genome Informatics Team, Bar Harbor, ME United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-0597
Paul SternbergCaltech, Biology and Bioengineering, Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-0173
Carol BultJackson Laboratory, Mouse Genome Informatics Team, Bar Harbor, ME United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-210X
Charles E CookGlobal Biodata Coalition, EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-8048

Funding

The Human Disease Ontology: An integrated, mechanistic knowledge resource for biomedical research.U24HG012557 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Lynn Marie Schriml · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG012557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Biocuration is the integration of biological information databases for the enhancement of research. Curation of these databases is challenged by the exponential growth of scientific data and literature. Integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence methods into biocuration workflows may help address this challenge. We report on the discussions, ideas, and recommendations gathered from a workshop "AI and biodata resources: implications for sustainability and best practices in biocuration" at the 18th Annual International Biocuration Conference 2025. Results: Participants agreed that while AI offers transformative potential for efficiency and expanded curatorial capacity, its integration faces substantial hurdles. Key challenges revolve around data and model quality. Reproducibility issues and a lack of open, domain-specific training datasets further compound these problems. Broader concerns include inconsistent data standards, underdeveloped ontologies, unstructured data, legacy systems, and underfunded teams.Despite these issues, several successful AI applications were identified, including tools for literature summarization and workflow assistance. Participants emphasized the need for a refined model of human-AI collaboration requiring clear data provenance and transparency, new skills, and avoiding over-reliance on AI-generated data. The workshop ultimately recommended concerted efforts in infrastructure development, standardization, training, and quality assurance to guide the community toward effective human-AI collaboration that maintains scientific rigor.

Identifiers

PMID42083647
PMCPMC13135627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.