ReviewThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Strategic Priorities for Advancing Eating Disorder Risk Reduction: A Narrative Review.
Review in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategic Priorities for Advancing Eating Disorder Risk Reduction: A Narrative Review.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Review
- Developing and Evaluating a Universal Primary School Body Image Program: An Uncontrolled Pilot Study of Butterfly Body Bright.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite decades of advances in treatment, eating disorders continue to impose substantial individual and societal burden, underscoring the need for earlier and more effective risk reduction. Prevention research has expanded considerably, producing a wide range of approaches that target modifiable risk factors, build individual coping skills, intervene within schools and families, leverage digital delivery formats, and, increasingly, consider policy and structural levers. Although many programs demonstrate small-to-moderate improvements in established risk factors, population-level impact has been limited. Effects are often modest, implementation is inconsistent, and scalability remains constrained. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary eating disorder risk reduction efforts across four interconnected dimensions that shape impact: mechanisms targeted, level of focus (from individual to population), personalization and cultural adaptation, and delivery and scalability. Across these domains, critical gaps emerge, including narrow mechanistic focus, imprecise risk stratification, underrepresentation of diverse populations, and limited integration of implementation science and economic and policy evaluation. This review argues that advancing eating disorder risk reduction requires a shift from efficacy-focused intervention development toward coordinated, multilevel, and implementation-informed strategies that prioritize precision, equity, system integration, and policy engagement. Such reorientation is essential if eating disorder risk reduction is to achieve meaningful and sustained population-level impact. Drawing on these findings, this review outlines a set of strategic priorities for advancing eating disorder risk reduction at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.