Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42084849›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2026

Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in Camelids of the New and Old World: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nashmin Mohemmi, Seyed Ahmad Karamati, Ronak Miladi, Mohammad Taghi Khodayari, Helia Bashiri, Reza Faraji, Shahab Falahi, Somayeh Jalilian, Arezoo Bozorgomid, Yazdan Hamzavi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nashmin MohemmiInfectious Diseases Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Seyed Ahmad KaramatiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, TeMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ronak MiladiInfectious Diseases Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-3142
Mohammad Taghi KhodayariResearch Center for Evidence-Based Health Management, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Helia BashiriDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Reza FarajiTuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-7301
Shahab FalahiZoonotic Diseases Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-2168
Somayeh JalilianInfectious Diseases Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Arezoo BozorgomidInfectious Diseases Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-9317
Yazdan HamzaviInfectious Diseases Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

Vice Chancellery for Research and Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences 4040720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neospora caninum (protozoa: Apicomplexa) is a major cause of economic losses in bovine production systems due to reproductive failure and abortion in cows. Although there is evidence of camelids being exposed to N. caninum, the importance of these animals in the parasite's life cycle is unclear. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted for the first time to assess the seroprevalence of N. caninum in camels to improve understanding of the epidemiology of the disease and identify factors influencing its prevalence. Relevant scientific articles were retrieved from three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) and the internet search engine Google Scholar without time limitations up to 1 August, 2025. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I

Indexed as

CamelusCoccidiosisNeosporaAnimalsFemaleSeroepidemiologic Studiescamelmeta‐analysisNeospora caninumneosporosisprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42084849
PMCPMC13142226

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.