Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42085496›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Learning protein representations with conformational dynamics.

Dan Kalifa, Eric Horvitz, Kira Radinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan KalifaDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-6833
Eric HorvitzAdaptive Systems and Interaction Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA 98052, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-0614
Kira RadinskyDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.ORCID 0009-0007-7918-2204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProteins change shape as they work, and these changing states control whether binding sites are exposed, signals are relayed, and catalysis proceeds. Most protein language models (PLMs) pair a sequence with a single structural snapshot, which can miss state-dependent features central to interaction, localization, and enzyme activity. Studies also indicate that many proteins assume multiple, functionally relevant shapes, motivating approaches that learn from this variability.

resultsWe present DynamicsPLM, a PLM conditioned on ensembles of computationally generated conformations to derive state-aware representations. DynamicsPLM improves predictive performance across protein-protein interaction, subcellular localization, enzyme classification, and metal-ion binding. On a widely used protein-protein interaction benchmark, it achieves a four-point accuracy gain over the strongest baseline. On a curated test set enriched for proteins with multiple conformational states, the margin increases to eleven points. These findings argue for a shift from static to dynamics-aware modeling, in which conformational variability is treated as informative. By elevating conformational state to a central element of machine learning in protein biology, this work advances modeling toward mechanisms that better reflect how proteins operate in cells and provides a route to actionable hypotheses about when and how binding, signaling, and catalysis occur. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code, model weights, and inference scripts are available at https://github.com/kalifadan/DynamicsPLM (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17668302).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningProtein ConformationProteinsBinding SitesProteins

Identifiers

PMID42085496
PMCPMC13197115

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.