Trial reportBlood advances2026
Safety and efficacy of allogeneic CD19-directed CAR-T therapy CTX110 in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04035434 (A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation and Cohort Expansion Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic CRISPR-Cas9-Engineered T Cells), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation and Cohort Expansion Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic CRISPR-Cas9-Engineered T Cells (CTX110) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies (CARBON)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThis multicenter, single-arm, phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of CD19-directed allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy CTX110 in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients received 1 or 2 treatment courses: standard lymphodepletion, followed by 1 CTX110 infusion at dose levels (DLs) 1 to 4 (3 × 107 to 60 × 107 CAR T cells; dose escalation, N = 32), or 2 infusions at DL4 on days 1 and 35 (cohort expansion, N = 31). Primary end points in dose escalation and cohort expansion were incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and objective response rate, respectively. CTX110 was administered to 63 heavily pretreated patients: 59% primary refractory, 43% with ≥3 previous therapies. Among 57 patients whose first infusion was DL ≥3, rates of objective and complete response (CR) were 65% and 39%, respectively. Among 22 patients achieving CR, 5 (23%) had ongoing CR at data cutoff, with 15 to 50 (median 34) months follow-up. The 2-infusion regimen prolonged response duration vs 1 infusion (hazard ratio, 0.65). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were reported in 54% and 13% of treated patients, respectively, including 2 grade ≥3 cases each. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (59%), and anemia and thrombocytopenia (35% each). Serious AEs occurred in 32% of treated patients, including CRS (14%), ICANS (8%), and febrile neutropenia (6%). In this R/R NHL population, CTX110 was well tolerated, resulting in clinically meaningful responses at DL ≥3, with a second infusion demonstrating further clinical benefit. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04035434.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.