ReviewBMJ open gastroenterology2026
Transarterial chemoembolisation-based combination therapy as a potential new standard for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the targeted immunotherapy era.
Review in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the standard therapy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy is limited by significant tumour heterogeneity. Recent landmark trials (EMERALD-1 and LEAP-012) demonstrated that adding targeted immunotherapy to TACE significantly improves progression-free survival compared with TACE alone. However, the inconsistent overall survival (OS) benefit, particularly in LEAP-012, highlights the necessity for precision patient stratification. Key determinants of outcomes include tumour burden, liver function, microvascular invasion (MVI), systemic inflammation, immune status and comorbidities. For patients with low tumour burden, optimised locoregional therapies can achieve higher complete response rates. For high tumour burden, multimodal strategies are required, with increasing evidence supporting TACE plus targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy. MVI-positive HCC derives added benefit from adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after TACE, while dynamic liver function monitoring is crucial for safety, especially in patients with Child-Pugh B. Future directions should focus on developing and validating robust multidimensional stratification models. These models should integrate key established determinants-such as tumour burden, liver function reserve, MVI, systemic inflammatory/immune status, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and comorbidities-with promising emerging biomarkers (eg, circulating tumour DNA). Concurrent efforts are needed to optimise combination regimens and conduct health-economic evaluations. Global collaboration and cost-effectiveness analyses are essential to prioritise high-benefit subgroups (eg, those with high tumour burden, MVI positivity and/or mild inflammation, active immune status alongside preserved liver function and limited comorbidities) for intensive combination therapy while avoiding overtreatment in lower-benefit populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.