ArticleAllergy2026
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Childhood Allergic Diseases: Increased Risk of Asthma Onset in the SENDO Project.
Article in Allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the role of genetic predisposition in asthma and other allergic conditions is well established, the contribution of nutritional patterns is heterogeneous and has been demonstrated in cross-sectional studies but not in prospective cohorts.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1546 participants enrolled in the SENDO cohort between January 2015 and June 2024. Children aged 4-5 years were prospectively recruited. UPF consumption was assessed at baseline and updated at the 3-year follow-up. Information on asthma and allergic diseases was collected at baseline and updated annually during the follow-up. A final sample of 691 participants was classified into tertiles (T1, T2, T3) according to UPF consumption. Prevalent cases were excluded from the analysis to ensure that incident cases were included during the follow-up. In the main analyses, we calculated the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI with survival analyses.
resultsAfter a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, the adjusted risk for asthma in each tertile (T1, T2, T3) of UPF consumption was 2.6%, 9.9%, and 7.6% respectively (p for trend: 0.03). In the fully adjusted model of the survival analysis, children with greater UPF consumption (T2 + T3) showed a significantly higher risk of asthma (HR 3.76; 95% CI 1.15-11.51, p = 0.02) but not of AA, nor other allergic outcomes compared with their peers in the lowest tertile (T1) of UPF consumption.
conclusionHigher UPF consumption may be associated with an increased risk of developing asthma in school-age children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.