In one paragraphArticle in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
14 authors.
Marcela HlaváčováDepartment of Climate Change Impacts on Agroecosystems, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic. hlavacova.m@czechglobe.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-8499 Jaromír PytelaPlant Phenotyping and Biotechnology Platform, Photon Systems Instruments, Průmyslová 470, 66424, Drásov, Czech Republic.
Natálie PernicováLaboratory of Ecological Plant Physiology, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-7813 Jan BalekDepartment of Climate Change Impacts on Agroecosystems, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3777 Daniela SemerádováDepartment of Climate Change Impacts on Agroecosystems, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-7924 Milan FischerDepartment of Climate Change Impacts on Agroecosystems, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-9317 Reimund P RötterDepartment of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling, Georg-August- Universität Göttingen, Wilhelmsplatz 1, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3804-9964 Mercy AppiahDepartment of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling, Georg-August- Universität Göttingen, Wilhelmsplatz 1, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-6350 Petr HlavinkaDepartment of Climate Change Impacts on Agroecosystems, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-5502 Vladimíra HorákováPlant Production Section, Department of Utility Value Testing, Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, National Plant Variety Office, Hroznová 63/2, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr ŠkarpaDepartment of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1665/1, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-1726 Miroslav TrnkaDepartment of Climate Change Impacts on Agroecosystems, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-8379 Funding
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004635Technologická Agentura České Republiky SS02030040
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Compared with other cereals, rye (Secale cereale L.) has traits that contribute to superior drought tolerance, thus making it a suitable alternative under intensifying droughts related to climate change. The distributions of these traits across a range of varieties and their relationships with yield potential have yet to be fully elucidated. Therefore, the sensitivity of 20 varieties, which differ in origin and age, to drought stress between the second half of stem elongation and the beginning of grain filling was analyzed. Potted plants were exposed to drought on an automated phenotyping platform, enabling accurate simulation of water loss for all varieties. Soil moisture was reduced to 30% of the soil water capacity, followed by rewetting. Although traditional varieties exhibited greater stability of key yield components under drought stress, modern varieties achieved higher absolute yields under both drought and well-watered conditions. Therefore, traditional varieties cannot replace modern varieties but remain valuable donors of drought resistance traits.
Indexed as
Drought ResistanceDroughtsSecaleStress, PhysiologicalPhenotypeSoilWaterSoilWaterDrought stressPhenotyping platformSecale cereale L.Yield components
Identifiers
PMID42086733
PMCPMC13333828
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390