ArticleScientific reports2026
Latent profile analysis of physical activity and mental health among chinese high school adolescents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent mental health is an increasingly urgent public health issue, and physical activity is often promoted as a practical way to support psychological well-being. Yet the benefits of physical activity may not increase linearly, and average associations can mask meaningful differences between subgroups. Using questionnaire data from a nationally archived Chinese adolescent health database, we analyzed 13,494 students aged 14-18 years. Physical activity was assessed with the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents, and psychological symptoms were measured with the Symptom Checklist-90, including nine symptom domains and a total index. We evaluated the shape of the activity-symptom association across the full activity range and used latent profile analysis to identify subgroups defined by the joint distribution of activity and symptom burden. A four-profile model was supported by fit and classification indices, with AIC = 876,522, BIC = 892,341, and entropy = 0.89; the Lo-Mendell-Rubin test favored four over five profiles (p = 0.012), and the bootstrap likelihood ratio test was significant (p < 0.001). The profiles captured substantial heterogeneity, spanning a high-activity/low-symptom pattern, a low-activity/high-symptom pattern, and two intermediate profiles in which similar activity levels co-occurred with different levels of distress. At the population level, symptom burden was lowest at moderate activity, while both lower and higher activity levels were associated with higher symptom burden than the moderate group. These findings indicate that activity volume alone does not fully explain adolescent psychological distress and support profile-informed approaches that prioritize an attainable moderate-activity target and targeted support for higher-risk subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.