ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Computational phenotyping of effort-based decision-making in type-2 diabetes on and off semaglutide.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation plays a fundamental role in human behaviour. Dopaminergic pathways have long been implicated in individual differences in motivation. Emerging evidence suggests such neural mechanisms interact with metabolic processes to coordinate energy expenditure with energy resources, thereby linking motivation with metabolic health. We ask whether a cognitive-computational index of motivation-reliably linked to neuropsychiatric symptoms-is altered in the context of type-2 diabetes and treatment with a GLP-1 agonist (semaglutide). In a pre-registered experiment, we quantified computational effort-based decision-making parameters in participants with diabetes on (N = 58) or off (N = 54) semaglutide treatment, compared to two groups of matched controls without diabetes (N = 58 each). Subjects with type-2 diabetes showed a blunted acceptance bias, a computational parameter describing the bias to accept effort for reward. This effect was not driven by neuropsychiatric comorbidity or antidepressant use. Across all participants, we found that increasing diabetes risk linearly predicted reduced acceptance bias. Participants with diabetes treated with semaglutide did not show restored motivation. Metabolic ill-health is associated with reduced acceptance bias during motivational decision-making. This blunting mirrors-but is largely independent of-neuropsychiatric motivational deficits. This suggests metabolic ill-health is accompanied by a cognitive shift towards energy conservation, potentially contributing to comorbidity between metabolic ill-health and mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.