Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Comparison of Outcomes From Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Combined With Physical Therapy Versus Infrared Therapy Combined With Physical Therapy Among Patients With Myofascial Low Back Pain.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common cause of chronic low back pain with trigger points in the muscles and fascia. This study compared outcomes after radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) plus physical therapy versus infrared therapy plus physical therapy among patients with myofascial low back pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS Overall, 112 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=56) or control group (n=56). For 6 weeks, the experimental group received physical therapy combined with rESWT (2000 pulses, 2.0-2.5 bar, twice weekly), whereas the control group received physical therapy combined with infrared therapy (15 minutes per session, twice weekly). Primary outcomes were pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and patient-reported improvement (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]). RESULTS The rESWT group showed greater improvements than the control group in pain (ΔNRS: 0.68±0.81 vs 0.13±0.66, P<0.001, Cohen's d=0.747), disability (ΔODI: 5.29±5.71 vs 0.84±5.49, P<0.0001, Cohen's d=0.793), and patient-reported improvement (PGIC: 2.82±1.53 vs 4.07±1.36, P<0.0001, Cohen's d=0.865). Within-group analysis revealed significant improvements in the rESWT group (NRS and ODI, both P<0.01) but not the control group (both P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with infrared therapy plus physical therapy, rESWT plus physical therapy yielded greater improvements in pain and disability. These findings support use of rESWT for the management of chronic low back MPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.