ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Fast dynamic voluntary contractions enhance corticospinal facilitation of the human diaphragm: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In limb muscles, corticospinal excitability is modulated by motor context, with greater facilitation during movement initiation and dynamic contractions than during sustained isometric activation. Whether this applies to the human diaphragm remains uncertain, given the hybrid automatic-voluntary control and continuous activity of respiratory motoneurones. To determine whether corticospinal excitability of the human diaphragm is influenced by the dynamics of voluntary inspiratory contraction at a given level of inspiratory mouth pressure, nine healthy participants (3 women, 6 men; age 23-39 years) performed inspiratory efforts against an occluded mouthpiece. Diaphragm motor evoked potentials (Di-MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from validated chest surface sites at end-expiration with the airway occluded, at rest, during sustained static inspiratory efforts at graded fractions of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (Pi,max), and during dynamic inspiratory efforts matched for pressure (20% Pi,max) but differing in rate of pressure development (slow vs. fast). Static efforts increased Di-MEP amplitude and shortened latency in a pressure-dependent manner. Slow dynamic efforts produced similar facilitation to static efforts. Fast dynamic efforts elicited greater facilitation, with increased amplitude and shortened latency. Corticospinal excitability of the diaphragm is modulated by contraction dynamics, with rapid efforts inducing additional facilitation beyond force alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.