ReviewJournal of healthcare leadership2026
Leadership in Obesity Care: Strategies to Support Healthcare Professionals in Effective Decisions, Communication, and Solutions - A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity care is central to addressing the global prevalence of obesity, yet patients still report lack of access to effective obesity-related services. Leadership among healthcare professionals (HCPs) is enacted through clinical decision-making, service design, advocacy, and communication practices that shape patient experience and access to care. In obesity prevention and management, it is therefore critical to translate evidence into effective, equitable practice. This study conducted a scoping review, with the question: "What leadership strategies in obesity care can support healthcare practitioners with effective decisions, communication, and solutions for people living with obesity?". Data from primary studies were synthesized in accordance with scoping review best practice and PRISMA guidelines. In total, 28 primary studies published between 2014 and 2025 were included. Obesity care and support strategies were mapped inductively according to frequency of strategy approach across studies, resulting in three categories: 1. Structural strategies; 2. General strategies; 3. Population-specific strategies. Findings were then synthesized deductively from the research question under the headings of 1. Communication; 2. Decision-making; and 3. Solutions. Mapping identified that the evidence base reporting adequate strategies remains limited, with gaps across policy, research, and practice compared with other chronic conditions. Key findings highlight calls for leadership at a structural level, particularly towards improving policy to address weight stigma across domains, and ensure that services are adequately resourced and financed. At service levels, the provision of high-quality and evidence-based obesity care requires the need for leadership in the development and evaluation of multi-level, interdisciplinary, and holistic approaches. HCPs also require training with skills for constructive conversations about weight, and in collaborative healthcare planning. To improve outcomes for people living with obesity, healthcare requires coordinated leadership across systems to address the drivers of obesity and ensure equitable access to services that are evidence-based, de-stigmatized, well-resourced, and supported by policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.