ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Plant-Derived Nanovesicles: Resolving Conceptual Confusion, Overcoming Isolation Challenges, and Advancing Translational Potential.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-derived nanovesicles (PDNVs) are promising bioactive nanoparticles with potential in drug delivery, immune regulation, and tissue repair. However, inconsistent terminology and isolation methods hinder reproducibility and clinical translation. A key confusion lies in their comparison with plant extracellular vesicles (PEVs), which are naturally secreted, whereas PDNVs are typically extracted by breaking plant tissues. This process yields a mix of extracellular and intracellular vesicles, creating both functional diversity and challenges. The heterogeneity complicates standardization, large-scale production, and quality control. Here, we clarify the distinctions between PDNVs and PEVs, and then we explore key factors that affect PDNVs isolation. These include the type of plant used, how the plant is processed, and how the vesicles are purified. We highlight workflow-specific optimizations that boost PDNV recovery (e.g. 4-5 fold higher yields with optimized PEG precipitation) and enhance purity (e.g. ATPS delivering multi-fold higher recovery while eliminating >95% of protein contaminants). Finally, we propose strategies to help establish standardized methods for using PDNVs in biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.