ReviewCancer2026
Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with cancer and cancer survivors: From clonal burden to cardiovascular diseases.
Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, clonal hematopoiesis (CH) has gained substantial attention as a prevalent, age-associated phenomenon with major implications for hematologic malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. CH arises from the clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells harboring somatic mutations, most commonly in genes implicated in leukemia. Beyond chronological aging, CH evolution is shaped by lifelong exposure to inflammatory, metabolic, and environmental stressors, such as smoking and obesity. More recently, cancer therapies-particularly cytotoxic treatments-have been shown to significantly increase the risk of CH. Therapy-related CH, however, exhibits a distinct mutational spectrum, frequently involving genes in the DNA damage response pathway, reflecting the selective pressure exerted by cytotoxic exposure. Current evidence largely supports that cytotoxic therapies primarily drive the expansion of preexisting mutant clones rather than inducing de novo mutations. The increased recognition of therapy-related CH has prompted growing interest in its prognostic and therapeutic implications in patients with cancer. To date, data regarding the prognostic impact of CH in cancer are conflicting, but the presence of CH generally portends worse overall survival, especially among patients with hematologic malignancies. Moreover, cancer survivors with CH appear to be at a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease, which may be further exacerbated by exposure to cardiotoxic cancer therapies. Collectively, these findings underscore the growing clinical relevance of CH and highlight its potential implications for precision medicine and survivorship care in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.