Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090108›Full record

ReviewDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2026

Tableting of nanoparticle-based formulations for oral delivery: Enhancing biopharmaceutical performance.

Sofía Peñaloza, Rodrigo Rozas, Andrés Núñez-Salinas, Rodrigo Pérez, Andrea Ortiz, Javier Morales, Francisco Arriagada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development andACS omega · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sofía PeñalozaDepartamento de Ciencias y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 8380494, Chile.
Rodrigo RozasDepartamento de Ciencias y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 8380494, Chile.
Andrés Núñez-SalinasUniversidad Andres Bello, Escuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Medicina, Santiago, 8370016, Chile.
Rodrigo PérezEscuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, 7510157, Chile.
Andrea OrtizEscuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, 7510157, Chile.
Javier MoralesDepartamento de Ciencias y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 8380494, Chile. javiermv@ciq.uchile.cl.
Francisco ArriagadaDepartamento de Ciencias y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 8380494, Chile. francisco.arriagada@ciq.uchile.cl.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 11240466Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 1221145Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 21230107Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 21251569Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Desarrollo (VID) de la Universidad de Chile ENL39/25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis review critically examines the integration of nanocarriers into oral tablet formulations, focusing on compaction strategies, excipient selection, and the impact of nanosystem properties on manufacturability, drug release, and biopharmaceutical performance. LITERATURE SEARCH: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting oral tablet formulations based on nanocarriers, including polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), dendrimers, and hybrid or lipid-based nanosystems. Relevant data on formulation strategies, compression methods, excipients, in vitro and in vivo performance, and critical quality attributes were extracted and analyzed.

resultsAfter removing duplicates and assessing relevance, 40 studies were selected for in-depth review. Polymeric nanoparticles consistently enhanced controlled release, with chitosan, polylactide acid, and casein-based systems enabling mucoadhesion or delayed dissolution. Silica-based nanocarriers, particularly MSNs, enhanced powder flow and tablet hardness when used within an optimal concentration range, whereas higher loadings negatively affected compressibility. Lipid nanoparticles and self-emulsifying systems facilitated immediate or sustained release while improving drug solubility. Freeze-drying, spray drying, and 3D printing were pivotal for stabilizing sensitive carriers. Hybrid systems, including metal-organic frameworks and chitosomes, provided tailored release and pharmacokinetic enhancement. Challenges included aggregation, poor flow, mechanical fragility, and regulatory limitations, though advances in excipient engineering, smart coatings, and manufacturing technologies are mitigating these barriers.

conclusionsNanocarrier-based tablets are a promising frontier for improving oral drug delivery, offering controlled release, enhanced bioavailability, and potential for multifunctionality. While nanocrystal-based products dominate the market, newer nanosystems show increasing promise. Future directions include personalized therapies, oral delivery of biologics, and integration of multifunctional nanocarriers enabled by emerging technologies such as 3D printing and stimuli-responsive coatings.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesTabletsAdministration, OralAnimalsDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingDrug LiberationExcipientsHumansSilicon DioxideDrug CarriersExcipientsSilicon DioxideTabletsBiopharmaceuticalDirect compressionNanocarrierNanoparticleOral deliveryTabletingTablet manufacturing

Identifiers

PMID42090108
PMCPMC13149836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.