Evidence mapPaperPMID 42090311Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Evaluating a Digital Chronic Condition Prevention Intervention (THRIVE) in Australian General Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (ePREVENT-360).

Gillian Singleton, Elizabeth Halcomb, Andrew Bonney, Hassan Hosseinzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gillian Singleton *School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, Australia, 61 2 4221 5351.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4621-4728
Elizabeth Halcomb *School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-986X
Andrew Bonney *School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-1646
Hassan Hosseinzadeh *School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, Australia, 61 2 4221 5351.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8638-5372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic conditions are responsible for a growing burden of morbidity, mortality, and cost globally. Despite widespread recognition of the need for preventive care, general practice remains underresourced and primarily focused on treatment. Digital health interventions (DHIs) present a scalable solution to support person-centered preventive care, but evidence regarding the feasibility and acceptability of multirisk consumer-facing interventions in general practice remains limited. Objective: This study (ePREVENT-360) aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and preliminary impact on health activation of a consumer-facing DHI, THRIVE (Tailored Health Risk Insights for Vital Empowerment) in Australian general practices. Methods: A mixed methods, pre-post feasibility study will be conducted in 5 general practices across New South Wales, Queensland, and Victoria. Adult consumers aged 30 to 65 years will use the THRIVE digital platform to receive chronic condition risk assessments, health scores, and action plans. Quantitative data will include engagement metrics, surveys, and chronic condition risk scores. Qualitative semistructured interviews with consumers and clinicians will provide data about acceptability, engagement, and sustainability. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive and multilevel regression methods, while qualitative data will be analyzed thematically. Results: The study has secured funding in 2024 through an Australian General Practice Research Foundation and Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia Research Foundation Health Services Research Grant. Consumer recruitment commenced in December 2025. Recruitment of the 5 participating general practices was completed in March 2026. As of April 2026, all clinician preintervention interviews have been completed, and consumer recruitment has commenced, with 25 consents obtained. Data collection is ongoing, with follow-up expected to be completed by December 2026. Outcomes will inform the iterative refinement of interventions and future trial designs to assess effectiveness. Conclusions: This study will address a key evidence gap in the digital prevention space by evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of a multicondition DHI embedded in general practices. The findings will support the development of a larger adaptive controlled trial and inform future implementation.

Indexed as

General PracticeAdultAustraliaChronic DiseaseDigital HealthFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch Designchronic conditiondigital healtheHealthfeasibilitygeneral practicepatient activationpreventionprimary care

Identifiers

PMID42090311
PMCPMC13148338

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.