Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090664›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2026

Demand creation for testing and Covid-19 surveillance indicators in the Covid-19 Testing, Isolation, Quarantine, and Telemonitoring Study.

Diana Zeballos, Fabiane Soares, Laio Magno, Thais Aranha Rossi, Gabriel Alves de Sampaio Morais, Carina Carvalho Dos Santos, Joice Neves Reis, Guilherme Barreto Campos, Lucas Miranda Marques, Alexandre Grangeiro and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Diana ZeballosUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2045-765X
Fabiane SoaresUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4067-7860
Laio MagnoUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-0782
Thais Aranha RossiUniversidade do Estado da Bahia. Departamento de Ciências da Vida. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-088X
Gabriel Alves de Sampaio MoraisUniversidade Federal da Integração Latino Americana. Instituto Latino-Americano de Economia, Sociedade e Política. Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-6314
Carina Carvalho Dos SantosUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Farmácia. Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-0851
Joice Neves ReisUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Farmácia. Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-2658
Guilherme Barreto CamposUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde. Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-9517
Lucas Miranda MarquesUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-8149
Alexandre GrangeiroUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5157-0597
Debora CastanheiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-1259
Thiago Silva TorresFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-601X
Valdilea Gonçalves VelosoFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6622-3165
Ines DouradoUniversidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1675-2146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the demand creation strategies for Covid-19 testing and to describe surveillance indicators for testing, quarantine, contact tracing, and telemonitoring in primary health care services.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Covid-19 Testing, Isolation, Quarantine, and Telemonitoring (TQT Covid-19) study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023. Primary healthcare service units in Rio de Janeiro and Salvador were selected to apply an intervention to develop demand creation strategies for testing uptake. Demand creation strategies were grouped into online strategies, traditional means, primary health care service units, community, and active search. Logistic regression was performed to determine the characteristics of the population reached by each strategy. The following Covid-19 surveillance indicators were estimated for testing and prevention (testing rate, positivity rate, monthly incidence, and full vaccination rate); for telemonitoring (monitoring rate, severity, referrals, and mortality); for quarantine (quarantine conditions); and for contact tracing (proportion of contacts traced and refusals of testing).

resultsThe intervention reached 12,401 individuals, and 11,843 tests were performed. Demand creation strategies that reached more individuals for testing were primary health care service units (37.0%) and active search (25.9%). The positivity rate during the study period was 27.2% in Salvador and 11.5% in Rio de Janeiro. A total of 14.1% of cases were monitored, and most were asymptomatic (42.5%) or mild (52.3%). No deaths were reported among monitored cases. The proportion of fully vaccinated individuals was 91.8%. Contact tracing identified 25.1% of reported contacts, and 41.5% declined testing.

conclusionsThe intervention facilitated expanded testing. Primary health care service units and active search were the strategies that reached more individuals for testing. Telemonitoring and contact tracing were the most challenging components to implement in primary health care services units and, given their importance, should be strengthened for future pandemics. These findings underscore the relevance of surveillance for assessing public health measures, identifying gaps, and supporting data-driven decision-making to improve epidemic management.

Indexed as

COVID-19QuarantineBrazilContact TracingCOVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2Telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42090664
PMCPMC13138124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.