ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026
Beyond a single signal: How can bovine pregnancy be established without IFNT?
Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interferon tau (IFNT) has been regarded as the dominant conceptus signal for maternal recognition of pregnancy (MRP) in ruminants. In cattle, IFNT is classically proposed to prevent luteolysis by suppressing uterine luteolytic pulses of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α). IFNT also induces endometrial interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) such as ISG15, MX dynamin-like GTPase 2 (MX2), and 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 1 (OAS1), thereby supporting uterine receptivity and an attachment-supportive immune milieu. A recent loss-of-function report using conceptuses lacking functional IFNT challenges this view by describing conceptus elongation and persistence of luteal function in a subset of recipients despite markedly reduced uterine ISG induction during the peri-implantation window. Here, we interpret this claim conservatively and specify experimental boundary conditions that currently limit generalization, including somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), multi-embryo transfer, limited sample size, and the absence of direct physiological readouts of PGF2α pulsatility and the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) axis. We then summarize possible buffering routes that could support early pregnancy when IFNT input is weakened, focusing on prostaglandin network rerouting toward luteoprotective outputs such as PGE2, extracellular vesicle (EV)-mediated communication, steroid-immune interactions, and corpus luteum (CL) gating of luteolytic sensitivity. Finally, we discuss how bovine endogenous retrovirus (BERV) long terminal repeats (LTRs) retaining interferon-responsive motifs, including interferon-stimulated response elements (ISREs), gamma-activated sequences (GAS), and ETS-family motifs, may act as enhancer substrates that amplify cytokine inputs in a cell-type and chromatin-dependent manner. Overall, we suggest that IFNT should be evaluated as a frequently dominant signal within a system that includes parallel buffering routes, such that the apparent requirement for IFNT can vary with conceptus load, uterine endocrine conditions, and ERV-derived regulatory architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.