Evidence mapPaperPMID 42091663Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Photon counting detector CT contrast agent-reduced transcatheter aortic valve reconstruction planning: a comparative study.

Yannik C Layer, Alexander Isaak, Narine Mesropyan, Patrick A Kupczyk, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Marilia Voigt, Tatjana Dell, Julian A Luetkens, Daniel Kuetting

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yannik C LayerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. yannik.layer@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-3352
Alexander IsaakDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Narine MesropyanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick A KupczykDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Dmitrij KravchenkoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Marilia VoigtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Tatjana DellDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Julian A LuetkensDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Daniel KuettingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContinuous efforts are made to reduce contrast media, improving patient safety, reducing environmental risks, and addressing recurring supply shortages. The aim of this study was to evaluate contrast agent-reduced CT protocols for transcatheter aortic valve reconstruction (TAVR) planning in photon counting detector CT (PCDCT). MATERIALS AND

methods162 BMI-matched examinations with standard dose contrast media (SCD; 80 mL; Iohexol 300 mg/mL; 81 examinations) and reduced contrast media dose (RCD; 50 mL; 81 examinations) for TAVR planning on a PCDCT were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Virtual monoenergetic reconstructions (VMI) at 70 keV, 60 keV and 50 keV of contrast agent-reduced examinations were compared with polyenergetic images. Quantitatively, regions-of-interest (ROIs) were placed in the abdominal aorta, iliac bifurcation, femoral artery, left ventricle and trapezius muscles. Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were calculated. Qualitatively, diagnostic quality and contrast were assessed on a visual grading scale of 1 (non-diagnostic) - 5 (excellent) and contrast agent dose was estimated.

resultsAveraged, SNR and CNR decreased by 8.71% and 16.78%, respectively, on PCDCT with reduced contrast dose (RCD vs. SCD; both p < 0.001). VMI50keV increased SNR by 44.10% (p < 0.001) and CNR by 52.73% (p < 0.001) compared with SCD. In the ascending aorta, SNR increased from 19.80 ± 6.24 (SCD) to 35.78 ± 13.20 (RCD

conclusionThe diagnostic efficacy of TAVR planning assessment using PCDCT with minimized contrast agent dosing is preserved, presenting a practical approach to conserve contrast media. KEY POINTS: Question The aim of the study was to implement a PCDCT-adapted contrast media dose protocol to reduce contrast agent volume at sufficient diagnostic quality. Findings PCDCT enables substantial contrast dose reduction for TAVR planning with maintained diagnostic image quality. Low-keV virtual monoenergetic image reconstructions compensate for the reduced iodine concentration. Clinical relevance The study demonstrates the potential of contrast media reduction of PCD-CT in clinical routine. This can benefit patients with renal impairment, for example, and reduce the negative effects of iodinated contrast media on the environment.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisContrast MediaTomography, X-Ray ComputedTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIohexolMalePhotonsRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioContrast MediaIohexolContrast mediaDose reductionIodine signalPhoton-counting detector computed tomographyTAVR planning

Identifiers

PMID42091663
PMCPMC13451408

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.