Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092043›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Comparison of post-isometric relaxation and active static stretching in improving hamstring flexibility among allied health sciences students: a randomized controlled trial.

Tooba Arif, Wajeeha Mehmood, Taqdees Arif

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07153510 ("Comparison of Post-Isometric Relaxation and Active Static Stretching Technique in Improving Hamstring Flexibility Among Allied Health Sciences Students"), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07153510 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

"Comparison of Post-Isometric Relaxation and Active Static Stretching Technique in Improving Hamstring Flexibility Among Allied Health Sciences Students"

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Health Sciences LahoreRan2025 to 2025Enrolled54ConditionsHamstring Tightness, Hamstring FlexibilityArmsPost-Isometric Relaxation, Active Static Stretching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tooba ArifDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan. toobaarif7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-7217
Wajeeha MehmoodDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9578-583X
Taqdees ArifUniversity of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-1510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hamstring tightness is a common musculoskeletal concern that can impair posture, restrict mobility, and predispose individuals to lower limb injuries. Various stretching techniques are employed to enhance flexibility, yet their comparative effectiveness remains debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) and Active Static Stretching (ASS) on the hamstring flexibility of allied health sciences students. A parallel-group, assessor-blinded, single-center randomized controlled trial was carried out at the University of Health Sciences, Lahore's Department of Physiotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07153510). Fifty-two students aged 18-25 years with hamstring tightness and Active Knee Extension (AKE) > 20° from full extension were randomly allocated to PIR (n = 26) group and ASS (n = 26) groups. After baseline treatment, Group A, PIR underwent sub-maximal isometric hamstring contraction for 7 s, followed by 15 s of passive stretch, repeated 10 times. Group B, ASS group performed active hamstring stretch held for 30 s, repeated 10 times. Both groups received 12 supervised sessions over four weeks (three sessions per week). Primary outcome was hamstring flexibility (AKE). Secondary outcomes included resolution of hamstring tightness. The Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 was used to analyze the data. At baseline, both groups were comparable in AKE values (PIR: 150.73° ± 7.94; ASS: 148.31° ± 8.32; p = 0.288). Both groups showed notable within-group increases following the intervention, but the PIR group's flexibility gains were noticeably larger. (165.69° ± 6.61 vs. 158.69° ± 8.23; p = 0.001). A universal goniometer was used to objectively measure hamstring flexibility during the Active Knee Extension (AKE) test. When AKE < 20° from full extension, resolution was taken into consideration. Hamstring tightness resolved in 67.3% of participants overall, with higher improvement rates in the PIR group. No adverse events were reported. Both PIR and ASS effectively improved hamstring flexibility in young adults; however, Post-Isometric Relaxation produced significantly superior improvements. The results suggest that PIR may be a preferred clinical and preventive strategy for enhancing flexibility and reducing the risk of hamstring tightness-related dysfunctions in student and general populations.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07153510. Registered prospectively, Registration Date: 10th July, 2025.

Indexed as

Hamstring MusclesIsometric ContractionMuscle Stretching ExercisesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultActive static stretchingFlexibilityHamstringRandomized controlled trialRelaxation

Identifiers

PMID42092043
PMCPMC13350981

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.