ReviewNature2026
Two decades of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality in cancer.
Review in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the Molecular Landscape of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: From Biology to Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Breast Cancer: Epidemiology, Molecular Classification, Diagnostics and Evolving Treatment Paradigms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Chromatin adaptation and histone remodeling as mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance and therapeutic vulnerability.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two decades ago, two papers in Nature described how PARP inhibitors selectively killed cells deficient in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 tumour suppressor genes, observations that led to the first clinically approved treatment of a cancer with a targeted therapy selected based on a germline biomarker. This work was recognized by Nature as one of the top 20 discoveries in cancer in the twenty-first century and provides a compelling example of leveraging fundamental biology discovery for patient benefit. For people with specific forms of breast, ovarian, prostate or pancreatic cancer, these discoveries changed their care, enabling the use of more effective and better tolerated targeted therapies that both improve survival and quality of life. This in turn extended the role of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing from determining risk in the unaffected, to being a companion diagnostic biomarker used to determine therapy for a patient with cancer. The significance of these discoveries spread beyond BRCA1-mutant and BRCA2-mutant cancers: the synthetic lethal concept of the BRCA-PARP inhibitor effect highlighted the myriad levels of functional redundancy that exist in tumour cells and stimulated the search for other tumour-specific synthetic lethal effects that could be exploited therapeutically. Here we distill the learnings from the past two decades in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42092061What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.