ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2026
Proteome Unravels Mechanism Differences in Embryogenesis Between Honey Bee Drone and Worker (Apis mellifera L.).
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physiological and social behaviors differ widely between honeybee workers and drones. All the organ rudiments of adult bees are formed during the embryonic stage. The initial molecular bases at the proteomic level for both embryonic developments have been identified, but a comprehensive understanding of the significant events involved in embryonic establishment remains elusive. To elucidate the molecular regulatory mechanisms underlying tissue differentiation during the embryogenesis of drones and workers, we implemented a state-of-the-art approach that combines in-hive inspection and targeted sampling (at nine embryogenesis stages) with high-throughput proteomics technology to investigate the developmental differences. In-hive inspection of hatching timing revealed an average developmental gap of approximately 3.6 h between the two embryos. Furthermore, proteomic analyses indicate that drone and worker embryos adopt distinct developmental strategies. Notably, proteins involved in fatty acid metabolism and key biological pathways related to organ formation-such as the Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways-are activated earlier in drones, suggesting that tissue development begins sooner in drone embryos than in workers. Additionally, the upregulation of cytoskeletal proteins and antioxidants in drone embryos likely supports their larger cell size and higher metabolic stress, reflecting distinct molecular characteristics of male development. Ribosomal proteins essential for biosynthetic support remain consistently expressed throughout the late stages in male embryos, indicating that drone embryogenesis lasts longer than that of workers. This work provides novel insights into the molecular foundations of honeybee embryogenesis and lays both theoretical and practical groundwork for future research into the mechanisms driving embryonic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.