Evidence mapPaperPMID 42093014Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2026

Caregiver burden in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Niharika Dadoo, Praisy K Prabha, Anuraag Jena, Chhagan L Birda, Sandeep Raut, Sandesh Parajuli, Akhilesh Sharma, Bikash Medhi, Shaji Sebastian, Vishal Sharma

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niharika DadooPostgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6725-7800
Praisy K PrabhaPostgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8407-8521
Anuraag JenaInstitute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-6698
Chhagan L BirdaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-4917
Sandeep RautPostgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2164-8658
Sandesh ParajuliTower Health-Reading Hospital, Reading, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4530-861X
Akhilesh SharmaPostgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Bikash MedhiPostgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4017-641X
Shaji SebastianIBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3670-6545
Vishal SharmaPostgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. docvishalsharma@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-3409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaregiver burden is increasingly acknowledged in chronic illnesses but its impact in the context of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) remains underexplored.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to evaluate caregiver burden across physical, emotional, psychological, financial, and social domains. Comprehensive database searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases on 3 February 2025. Studies assessing at least one aspect of caregiver burden in IBD were included. Data extraction and bias assessment were carried out independently by reviewers. Pooled prevalence rates for caregiver burden and associated domains were estimated using a random-effects model in R.

resultsOut of 383 records, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 12 eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of caregiver burden was 470 per 1000 carers (95% CI: 390-560), depression at 370 per 1000, and anxiety at 400 per 1000. Loss of work productivity and activity impairment were reported in 290 and 300 per 1000 caregivers, respectively. Stress, reduced quality of life, and financial burden were also common. Coping strategies varied, with adaptive strategies (e.g., religious practices) linked to lower burden. Caregiver burden was notably higher in cases of active disease, severe IBD, and among caregivers with additional dependents or personal psychiatric histories.

conclusionThis systematic review underscores a substantial and multidimensional burden on caregivers of IBD patients, affecting mental health, productivity and quality of life. Future interventions should incorporate caregiver-centred support mechanisms and resilience training, emphasising psychosocial care as an integral component of IBD management. The study was registered on Open Science Framework (OSF), Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YA3NU .

Indexed as

Caregiver BurdenInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyCaregiversCost of IllnessDepressionHumansQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalAnxietyCaregiver burdenCarersDepressionInflammatory bowel diseaseMental health

Identifiers

PMID42093014
PMCPMC13312674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.