ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026
Detection of macrovesicular steatosis in hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological images of human livers: A feature-based method.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) affects liver transplant outcomes. Traditional visual biopsy assessment is subjective and shows inter-observer variability (weighted κ = 0.595 in our cohort), which complicates allocation and prognostication. Methods: We developed a semi-automated image analysis method using HALCON Progress (evaluation license, 2019-2023) to quantify MaS in H&E whole-slide images (WSIs). The pipeline processes native SVS files at full resolution (average runtime 1.26 ± 0.53 min/WSI) without tiling, downsampling, or format conversion. Four shape features (area, roundness, circularity, and compactness) guide classification. Results were compared with three specialized pathologists using Pearson and Spearman correlations. Results: Across 129 WSIs (≈52,000 lipid droplets), artificial intelligence-pathologist correlations were statistically significant (Pearson Conclusions: The method provides a rapid, objective readout of MaS and performs on par with inter-pathologist agreement (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.