ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026
Early-life adversity in rodents: Experimental design is of the essence.
Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-life adversity (ELA) is a well-documented risk factor for the development of psychiatric illnesses. Prospective investigations in humans are complex and limited in their ability to study the underlying neurobiological mechanisms, which is why many have reverted to animal models to examine the lasting consequences of ELA. In this contribution, we focus primarily on exposure to ELA during the postnatal period and highlight crucial elements of the experimental design that decisively contribute to the observed outcome. These elements include i) aspects of timing, encompassing the developmental stage during which ELA is experienced, the duration and repetitiveness of early-life stressors, and the time point at which the outcomes are investigated; ii) the early-life environment, e.g., the quality and quantity of parental care, the breeding specifics, housing conditions and nutrition, or mitigating interventions; iii) characteristics of later-life readouts, i.e., specific behavioral domains examined, the tasks selected to probe these domains, and the state of the animal at the time of testing; and iv) sex differences. We conclude by discussing how to maximize the advantages of ELA animal models to gain a comprehensive insight into the (neuro)biological mechanisms underlying the lasting consequences of ELA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.