ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026
Patient perceptions of remotely-delivered exercise services for osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study in Hong Kong.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Exercise is fundamental to osteoarthritis (OA) management, but access to in-person programs is often limited. Remotely-delivered exercise services (RDES) present a viable alternative; however, their acceptability among patients in Hong Kong (HK) is not well established. This study sought to investigate patient perceptions, compare them with existing Australian data, and inform the development of culturally tailored OA care in urban Asian settings. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted using online surveys completed by 243 OA patients in HK. Participants rated their perceptions on 5-point Likert scales. Descriptive analysis was conducted and results were visualized using radar charts, and findings were compared with one published Australian study. Results: Although 70% of HK patients expressed interest in RDES, valuing time-saving (79%) and convenience (67%), significant concerns persisted. Only 34% found RDES affordable, and merely 40% believed it offered satisfaction equivalent to in-person care. Furthermore, HK patients reported lower agreement than Australians on satisfaction (40% vs 68%) and ease of use (51% vs 78%). Conclusion: Hong Kong OA patients recognize the potential benefits of RDES, yet key concerns regarding affordability, satisfaction, and effectiveness remain. The discrepancies with both local clinicians and international benchmarks highlight a critical implementation gap. These findings emphasize the necessity for co-designed, culturally adapted interventions to successfully integrate RDES into OA care in Hong Kong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.