ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2026
Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulation Reveal the Anti-Colitis Mechanism of
Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A combination of bioinformatics methods including network pharmacology, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation was utilized to investigate the potential mechanism of Methods: We firstly used network pharmacology to screen out the major active components, targets and pathways. Secondly, the top 5 ingredients and the top 5 targets were docked with molecular docking technology respectively. Thirdly, the two protein-compound complexes with the lowest binding scores were subjected to molecular dynamics simulation (MDs). Results: A total of 15 bioactive compounds and 191 targets were identified, with the top 5 compounds being quercetin, beta-sitosterol, naringenin, stigmasterol and diosgenin, and the top 5 targets being AKT1, IL-6, TNF, TP53 and IL-1β. Predominant enrichment was observed in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway and apoptosis. Each set of molecular docking calculations was run 50 times and repeated 3 times for statistical analysis, with results showing that the majority of binding energies were less than -5 kcal/mol, indicating successful docking. Specifically, stigmasterol-TP53 (-9.10 ± 0.07 kcal/mol) and diosgenin-TP53 (-8.80 ± 0.73 kcal/mol) are the two complexes with the lowest binding energies for MDs. According to the MDs, the stig-masterol-TP53 and diosgenin-TP53 complex shows ideal conformational stability and interaction energy. Conclusion: Multiple components of SG may exert therapeutic effects on UC through multiple targets and various signaling pathways. Novelty of this study lies in linking SG compounds to UC-specific targets and confirming stable docking/MDs interactions with TP53. However, further validation through in vivo and in vitro experiments is required to provide reliable evidence for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.