Evidence mapPaperPMID 42094091Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2026

Machine Learning Models to Evaluate County-Level Incidence of Diagnosed Diabetes and Sociodemographic Factors.

Alexander S Keigley, Shant Ayanian, Sagar B Dugani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander S KeigleyAdmission and Transfer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Shant AyanianDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sagar B DuganiDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

Rural Patient Risks and Exposures for Diabetes ConTrol (Rural PREDICT)K23MD016230 · NIMHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · 2023 to 2025
$300k
NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD016230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate county-level incidence of diagnosed diabetes and key sociodemographic factors in a high-dimensional, nonlinear setting. Methods: This temporally aggregated observational study used US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data on county-level incidence of diagnosed diabetes, from 2004 to 2019, and 34 sociodemographic factors from public databases. We defined counties as Results: Overall, 500 of 3114 counties (16.1%) were of higher-burden. Elastic net regression showed good predictive performance for estimating diabetes incidence ( Conclusions: Machine learning models demonstrated consistent performance in estimating and classifying county-level diabetes incidence, with high discrimination for identifying higher-burden counties. Sociodemographic factors, including

Indexed as

DiabetesMachine learningSocial determinants of healthSocial vulnerability index

Identifiers

PMID42094091
PMCPMC13141798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.