ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A CT-based radiomics model for predicting pain relief after radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases: a dual-center study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a CT-based radiomics model for predicting pain relief after palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases, and to compare the performance of 11 machine learning algorithms. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients with bone metastases who received palliative radiotherapy at Xuzhou Central Hospital (Center 1) and Xuzhou First People's Hospital (Center 2) between January 2022 and December 2024. All patients completed a prescribed dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Clinical variables-including age, sex, primary tumor type, pattern of bone destruction, and metastatic site-were collected alongside CT images. Pain response was assessed per the International Consensus on Endpoints for Palliative Radiotherapy in Bone Metastases: complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were grouped as the relief group, while progressive disease (PD) and stable disease (SD) constituted the non-relief group. ROIs were delineated over the tumor areas on bone-window CT images, and radiomic features were extracted, normalized, and screened to construct a radiomics signature. Eleven machine learning classifiers were trained and compared; the optimal model was selected for predictive performance evaluation and clinical applicability analysis. Results: A total of 134 eligible patients were included (pain relief group: n = 53; non-relief group: n = 81). Center 1 patients were randomly split approximately 8:2 into training (n = 91) and internal validation (n = 26) sets; Center 2 served as the external test set (n = 17). No significant differences existed between the two centers in baseline demographics, tumor-related variables, or treatment parameters, except for bone-protective drug use and bone metastasis site. After feature selection, 7 radiomic features remained for modeling. Among 11 tested machine learning models, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) model demonstrated the best performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.823 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.743-0.903) in the training set, 0.812 (95% CI: 0.661-0.964) in the internal validation set, and 0.818 (95% CI: 0.556-1.000) in the external test set. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated favorable net clinical benefit. Conclusion: The KNN model based on CT radiomics can effectively predict pain relief outcomes after palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases, showing potential clinical utility, and may help identify patients likely to achieve pain relief from radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.