ArticleOncology letters2026
Evaluation of smoking status as a prognostic factor under immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: A single center analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smoking may influence cancer treatment outcomes; however, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in active smokers. It has been suggested that smokers receiving ICIs may achieve improved outcomes compared with non-smokers. The present study aimed to challenge this assumption by investigating the prognostic impact of smoking status and other characteristics in patients with metastatic or advanced cancer undergoing ICI therapy. In the present study, patients with predetermined solid tumors who received ICIs either as a monotherapy or in combination regimens in a palliative treatment setting were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were included if they had received >1 dose of an ICI and had an available smoking status. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to analyze the associations between smoking status and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The patient baseline characteristics were assessed as potential prognostic markers using univariate and multivariate analyses. Of the 464 patients evaluated, 180 met the inclusion criteria. The cohort included patients with lung cancer (n=94), renal cell carcinoma (n=18), urothelial cancer (n=21), melanoma (n=3), and head and neck cancer (n=44). The median OS and PFS times for the whole cohort were 39.1 and 5.5 months, respectively. Patients were categorized as never-smokers (n=45, 25%), former smokers (n=81, 45%) and active smokers (n=54, 30%). The median OS times for the never, former and active smokers were 66.4, 31.6 and 13.9 months, respectively. When comparing the active smokers with the former and never smokers, the median OS times were 13.9 vs. 41.1 months (P=0.069, trend). Multivariate analyses identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥3 [hazard ratio (HR), 5.85; P=0.002], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; HR, 1.11; P=0.017), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; HR, 1.00; P<0.001) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as continuous variables (HR, 1.01; P=0.002) as significant predictors of a poorer OS. For PFS, multivariate analysis identified sex (HR, 0.69; P=0.049), age (HR, 0.98; P=0.014) and ECOG performance status ≥3 (HR, 5.83; P<0.001) as independent predictors of a shorter PFS. In conclusion, contrary to prior hypotheses suggesting improved outcomes for smokers undergoing ICI therapy, the results of the present study demonstrated a trend towards impaired survival outcomes in active smokers compared with never and former smokers. The independent prognostic factors for a poorer OS included a poor ECOG performance status, CRP level, LDH level and NLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.