Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094874›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2026

Modelling spatial heterogeneity in exposure buffers and risk: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.

Saskia Comess, Daniel E Ho, Joshua L Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saskia ComessEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-7659
Daniel E HoRegulation, Evaluation and Governance Lab, Stanford Law School, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Joshua L WarrenDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6274-6970

Funding

Extreme heat events and pregnancy duration: a national studyR01ES028346 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD H, DARROW, LYNDSEY · 2018 to 2024
$2.7M
Predict, Detect, Diagnose: Confronting Outbreaks of HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Among People Who Use DrugsR01DA060716 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Gregg Steven Gonsalves, Joshua Lindsey Warren · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
Environmental Chemical Exposures and Biologic Markers for Cerebral Palsy (EXPOSE CP)R01ES034756 · NIEHS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZEYAN LIEW · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA060716NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028346NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES034756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Place-based epidemiology studies often rely on circular buffers to define 'exposure' to spatially distributed risk factors, where the buffer radius represents a threshold beyond which exposure does not influence the outcome of interest. This approach is popular due to its simplicity and alignment with public health policies. However, buffer radii are often chosen relatively arbitrarily and assumed constant across the spatial domain. This may result in suboptimal statistical inference if these modelling choices are incorrect. To address this, we develop spatially varying buffer radii (SVBR), a flexible hierarchical Bayesian spatial change points approach that treats buffer radii as unknown parameters and allows both radii and exposure effects to vary spatially. Through simulations, we find that SVBR improves estimation and inference for key model parameters compared to traditional methods. We also apply SVBR to study healthcare access in Madagascar, finding that proximity to healthcare facilities generally increases antenatal care usage, with clear spatial variation in this relationship. By relaxing rigid assumptions about buffer characteristics, our method offers a flexible, data-driven approach to accurately defining exposure and quantifying its impact. The newly developed methods are available in the R package

Indexed as

exposure modellingGaussian processeshierarchical Bayesian methodsspatial epidemiologyuncertain geographic context problem

Identifiers

PMID42094874
PMCPMC13142215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.