Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

TCM-DiffRAG: personalized syndrome differentiation reasoning method for traditional Chinese medicine based on knowledge graph and chain of thought.

Jianmin Li, Ying Chang, Yujia Liu, Yanwen Wang, Binkai Ou, Shuyuan Lin, Su-Kit Tang, Lirong Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jianmin LiFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Ying ChangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yujia LiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yanwen WangHangzhou Ganzhicao Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China.
Binkai OuGuangdong Institute of Intelligence Science and Technology, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Shuyuan LinSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Su-Kit TangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Lirong ZhengGuangdong Institute of Intelligence Science and Technology, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology can empower large language models (LLMs) to generate more accurate, professional, and timely responses without fine-tuning. However, due to the complex reasoning processes and substantial individual differences involved in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical diagnosis and treatment, traditional RAG methods often exhibit poor performance in this domain. Objective: To address the limitations of conventional RAG approaches in TCM applications, this study aims to develop an improved RAG framework tailored to the characteristics of TCM reasoning. Methods: We developed TCM-DiffRAG, an innovative RAG framework that integrates knowledge graphs (KG) with chains of thought (CoT). TCM-DiffRAG was evaluated on three distinctive TCM test datasets. Results: The experimental results demonstrated that TCM-DiffRAG achieved significant performance improvements over native LLMs. For example, the qwen-plus model achieved scores of 0.927, 0.361, and 0.038, which were significantly enhanced to 0.952, 0.788, and 0.356 with TCM-DiffRAG (McNemar test, Conclusion: TCM-DiffRAG shows that integrating structured TCM knowledge graphs with Chain-of-Thought-based reasoning substantially improves performance in individualized diagnostic tasks. The joint use of universal and personalized knowledge graphs enables effective alignment between general knowledge and clinical reasoning. These results highlight the potential of reasoning-aware RAG frameworks for advancing LLM applications in traditional Chinese medicine.

Indexed as

chain-of-thoughtknowledge graphmulti-step reasoningretrieval-augmented generationtraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID42094955
PMCPMC13140767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.